|
Newsletter
November 2001
[No.2 2001]
Where were you on 11 September?
|
The date
11 September 2001 will haunt us all for many years to come,
in ways that we probably cannot yet envisage, and perhaps
that is just as well.
The deeds
of that day demanded a response, and it was perhaps inevitable
although regrettable that the response has been what it has.
But as part of the wider campaign for peace we must wonder
if there is some better response. We know that, as surely
as night follows day, a violent response to a violent deed
will be followed by yet more violence. That is happening before
our eyes right now in Afghanistan, where the number of casualties
is growing, many of them innocent victims of someone else's
war. There is growing humanitarian disaster as millions of
refugees try to escape from Afghanistan, from the cluster
bombs and the greater obscenity of the so-called daisy cutter.
And we must remember that Afghanistan was already one of the
most heavily mined countries on the planet.
|
In
this newsletter:
|
|
The landmine
campaign seems to have been partly overshadowed by these other
more immediate events. But it is vital that we do not lose
our focus on what we are trying to do, to free the world from
the plague of landmines which still affects the innocent,
the poor, the women and children and the subsistence farmers.
There
is some good news. The Third Meeting of States Parties to
the Mine Ban Treaty in Managua reported progress towards universalisation
of the treaty. Landmine Monitor 2001 details what is being
done, country by country. There are more treaty ratifications,
more and better support for landmine victims, more demining
which returns farmland to impoverished villagers. The final
Managua declaration acknowledges that Non-State Actors must
also be brought on board with the treaty provisions, even
though they cannot sign up to the treaty itself. But there
is much still to be done.
We look
to the (postponed) Brisbane Commonwealth Heads of Government
Meeting (CHOGM) next March to endorse the Ottawa Treaty, and
encourage Commonwealth non-signatories and signatories to
move towards full adoption of the treaty.
In the
mean time, I encourage you to participate as you are able
in the fundraising to assist towards landmine clearance work
in Mozambique.
Neil Mander
CALM Convenor
|
Jody
Williams and ICBL participate in Nobel Peace Prize centennial
Jody Williams
and Steve Goose, on behalf of the ICBL, participated in events celebrating
the 100th anniversary of the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway at
the beginning of December. On the occasion of the centennial, they
joined approximately 30 Nobel Peace Prize laureates invited by the
Nobel Institute to participate in these events. A Symposium was
held 6-8 December, in which laureates and academics addressed the
themes around "The Conflicts of the 20th century and the solutions
for the 21st century."
Presentations
were made by Jody Williams and Steve Goose and fellow laureates
Norman Borlaug, Kim Dae-Jung, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, John Hume,
His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Mairead Maguire, Rigoberta Menchu Tum,
Jose Ramos-Horta, Joseph Rottblat, Oscar Arias Sanchez, David Trimble,
Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Lech Walesa, Elie Wiesel and representatives
from AFSC, Amnesty International, Medecins Sans Frontieres, ICRC,
IFRC, ILO, International Peace Bureau, IPPNW, Pugwash, UNICEF, UNHCR,
and other institutions that have received the prize over the years.
Jody Williams,
speaking on a panel called Militarism and arms races--Strengthen
arms control and disarmament, noted "I keep hearing that the
events of September 11 have changed the world . . . I'm not so sure
September 11 changed the world. Certainly it changed the psyche
of people in the United States. But that is not the same as changing
the world." She emphasized that the world reacted in the 'usual
fashion' of using violence to the horrific crime against humanity.
"I wonder when the line will be crossed, when patriotism becomes
xenophobia
.We are told we are going to war to protect civilisation
and freedom at the same time as draconian laws are being passed
[in the US] to take away our freedom."
She said that
while she had visited Ground Zero in New York, and she kept thinking
of "our colleagues, who brought us pictures of Grozny, in Chechnya.
The whole city is Ground Zero. All of Afghanistan, before the bombing
began, was already a Ground Zero."
Jody closed
by emphasizing that individuals can make a difference in the world.
"However, not the individual alone
behind this face there
are thousands of people who worked together to change the world
on the landmine issue. The only way we'll change the world is to
empower civil society, to increase people's ability to create the
world that they want to live in
The landmine campaign is about
the power of civil society and the individual to work with states
in a different way to create laws that affect us all...If we succeed
we all do, but if we fail, we all do."
Steve Goose,
on the same panel, summarized the landmine ban movement and the
successes of the campaign, in the hopes that looking at some elements
of it might provide guidelines for other disarmament issues. He
identified the following elements: a focus on the humanitarian aspect
and international humanitarian law; the vital role of civil society,
noting "We showed that civil society could demand action, get
it, and have success"; the important role of medium and small-size
states in setting the international diplomatic agenda; a partnership
between civil society and pro-ban governments, ICRC and UN agencies;
and "the importance of pursuing non-traditional diplomacy through
openness and inclusivity". He also described the progress made
in the ban movement since 1997, the Landmine Monitor initiative,
and successes of the Mine Ban Treaty, as well as the work remaining
to be done. [ICBL]
While in London
at the end of September, CALM Convenor Neil Mander called on Rt
Hon Don McKinnon, Commonwealth Secretary-General, and the office
of the NZ High Commissioner in London (Rt Hon Paul East) and presented
them each with a copy of Landmine Monitor 2001 and its Executive
Summary.
Fundraising
for Mozambique
Why Mozambique?
Because it is a desperately poor African country with large areas
of productive land that can't be used because of landmines; it suffers
many landmine deaths and casualties each year, many of them children;
and the NZ Army has been helping train deminers and administer mine
clearance there since 1994.
In partnership
with UNICEF, CALM organised a function at Parliament on 2 November
to raise funds for UNICEF's anti-landmine activities in Mozambique.
Host for the evening was long-time CALM supporter Graham Kelly MP.
Major Derek
Baxter, formerly Chief Technical Adviser to Mozambique's Accelerated
Deming Program, gave an illustrated talk about his (and the NZ Army's)
work, and Neil Mander (CALM Convenor) launched Landmine Monitor
2001.
CALM supporters
can continue to help Mozambique through hosting a dinner in their
home, following the example of Canada's "Night of a thousand
dinners" on 30 November. The Canadian Landmine Foundation and
United Nations Association of the USA encouraged people around the
world to host dinners to raise awareness and funds for banning and
clearing landmines and helping survivors.
CALM calls on
its supporters to do the same: You can make the event as small or
as large as you like, you can invite a few friends to your house
for dinner, or organise an event with others in the community. You
can use the dinner to raise awareness about landmines in Mozambique
(and elsewhere). Remind your friends that they can make a difference
by writing to their MP or the newspaper about the scourge of landmines,
and by donating money. Any funds raised from the dinners will go
to UNICEF for their landmine work in Mozambique, and UNICEF will
send a tax receipt to the donors. Because the holiday season is
now with us, and many people have a busy social calendar, why not
plan your dinner for the new year - what better way to start off
2002 than a relaxed fund-raising event, at home, for such a good
cause!
For more information,
visit http://www.1000dinners.com. For material about landmine assistance
to children in Mozambique, contact Dennis McKinlay at UNICEF: phone
(04) 473-0879 or 0800 2 help kids (0800 243 575), or 2helpkids@unicef.org.nz.
For information about CALM, contact John Head at: jhead@i4free.co.nz.
For recipes from Mozambique, contact Helen Zwartz at: zwartz@actrix.co.nz.
Afghanistan
suffers again
Afghanistan
is already one of the world's most heavily mined countries, littered
with ordnance made by Russians, Iranians, Italians and Pakistanis.
But the US bombing
of former Taliban positions has added a new killing machine to the
multitude of unexploded devices strewn across Afghanistan's expansive
dusty plains, in orchards, rice fields, and villages.
Campaign group
Landmine Action says US military figures show 600 cluster bombs
have been dropped in Afghanistan. Each cluster bomb contains 202
"BLU 97" bomblets which are designed to shred enemies'
flesh and wreck their equipment on the ground.
But somewhere
between seven and 30 percent of the devices fail to detonate on
impact and either sink into the ground or lie on the surface. They
effectively become land mines.
As refugees
return to their homes, they are in severe danger from landmines
and unexploded cluster bombs. The UN estimates that 10 Afghans are
killed or maimed every day by mines. Some cleared minefields are
having to be recleared since the latest fighting and bombing. [Reuters]
Report
from Managua
CALM's founder,
John Head, represented CALM as a member of the NZ Government delegation
at the Third Meeting of States Parties to the Ottawa Convention
in Managua, Nicaragua, in September. Notes from his report:
Because the
September 11 terrorist attacks on the USA caused plane cancellations
and delays I missed the first day of the Conference and the two
preceding days of ICBL meetings. The only government delegations
from Pacific nations were from Australia and New Zealand. The NZ
delegation consisted of Ambassador Paul Tipping from Mexico and
myself as resource person. My travel and hotel expenses were funded
by PADET.
Overview: The
International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) stated that this
"was indeed a very successful meeting, a major step forward
along the road to clearing the world of this weapon that has caused
so much havoc and suffering in the world." Ten new countries
had ratified or acceded to the Treaty since the Second Meeting,
and they expected another ten before the Fourth Meeting. To me this
was a very conservative estimate. Susan Walker, a prominent international
ICBL campaigner, told me she would be disappointed if another 23
countries had not joined the Treaty in the next 12 months. We have
some work to do here in the Pacific.
The role of
the ICBL: From the beginning of the Conference, the important role
of the ICBL was accepted. The Landmine Monitor 2001 was distributed
to delegates on the first day, and information in it was frequently
referred to by delegates. LM2001 certainly gave the ICBL considerable
status. At the official opening, Norwegian Ambassador Steffan Kongstad,
outgoing conference president, paid tribute to the ICBL and the
ICRC for starting this campaign to rid the world of landmines and
for "conveying human suffering into a strong political message."
ICBL Ambassador Jody Williams gave a hard-hitting keynote speech
calling for delegates to take a "hard look at the issues of
compliance with this treaty that still face us." She went on
to say, "Civil society and governments came together not just
to create the Treaty but also to ensure full compliance with it."
(Questions had been raised in LM2001 and by some conference delegates
about the use of landmines by two African and one Asian country
which have signed the Treaty.) On the second day Steve Goose, ICBL
delegation leader, spoke for nearly 30 minutes on the concerns and
hopes of the ICBL, and other ICBL campaigners spoke on their particular
portfolios - it must have been obvious to all that the ICBL has
many clearly focused and dedicated campaigners who are determined
to see that the Ottawa Convention is universally accepted and fully
implemented. For many diplomats at the conference, the abolition
of landmines is just one of many concerns.
The NZ Statement:
Ambassador Tipping emphasised that NZ will continue to lend its
strongest support towards the total elimination of landmines. He
acknowledged our country's financial contribution to demining activities
worldwide, and the work of our Army deminers in many countries.
Under the Ottawa Convention, States Parties are able to retain live
mines for training. Our Army has kept none, but has developed (with
a Stokes Valley company) a suitable simulator device which is used
to train soldiers in the necessities of mine awareness. Ambassador
Tipping referred to the production of this model, which we hoped
other countries would seek further information about, as NZ Army
research failed to find a suitable simulator available anywhere
else in the world. The NZ statement referred to the success of the
March 2001 UN Asia-Pacific Regional Disarmament Conference in Wellington,
and the joint efforts with CALM to encourage more ratifications
of the Treaty from pacific countries.
Non State Actors (NSAs): The Philippines and Colombia in their opening
statements emphasised the importance of calling on armed groups
acting against or beyond the control of states to abide by international
law and to ban the use of landmines. Neil Mander and I had asked
our government to make a similar statement. The Ottawa Convention
is silent on the activities of NSAs, but at this conference there
was an amendment to the final communiqué which said that,
"We also recognise that progress to free the world from anti
personnel mines would be promoted by Non State Actors to cease and
renounce their use in line with the international norm established
by this Convention." It was agreed to without discussion. The
ICBL saw this as "one of the most concrete items that emerged
from the week." The ICBL's Non State Actors Working Group (NSAWG)
has been working with NSAs for some years, and has had some success
in getting three NSAs to renounce the use of landmines.
Raising victims' voices: On the last morning, ICBL brought eight
people who had been injured by landmines so that everyone at the
conference could hear their story and endorse the message that landmines
must be banned and cleared from all lands. This was a very sobering
time.
A concern:
Anti-tank mines are permitted under the Ottawa Convention along
with anti-handling devices (AHDs) which cause the mine to explode
when an attempt is made "to tamper with or intentionally disturb
the mine." (I recall some heated debates on AHDs at the 1997
Oslo Conference when the precise wording of the Ottawa Convention
was finalised.) The problem is that some AHDs are so sensitive that
they make the anti-tank mine act like an anti-personnel mine (APM),
and explode by the presence, proximity or contact with a person.
The debate continues, even though the ICRC and the ICBL have done
considerable research into which AHDs act as APMs. Norway led a
number of countries calling for the banning of those AHDs, a move
supported by ICRC and ICBL. However Britain, Japan and Germany called
for more research on the issue and so no decision was made. In the
diplomatic arena the real reason for decisions is sometimes masked
by fine words. I learned afterwards that no decision was reached
because certain countries were not prepared to follow Canada's example
and destroy those AHDs that research showed acted as APMs.
Another concern:
We here are very aware that NZ was one of the first group of countries
to call for an international ban on the use of APMs. We were the
14th country to sign the Ottawa Convention. Our Army engineers have
carried out demining challenges for the UN in many parts of the
world with integrity and distinction. Since 1996 our government,
its diplomats and officials have spoken out in support of full implementation
of the Ottawa Treaty. I must admit that I am a one-eyed New Zealander,
and that we are a small country, but I am concerned at how little
impact NZ seems to have made in the world of the Ottawa Convention.
Only once at Managua was NZ mentioned by another delegation. When
donor lists for new projects were announced, NZ was never mentioned.
Our policy of replacing the use of live mines for training, replacing
them with simulated mines, does not seem to have made any impact.
Although we have well-informed and capable diplomats in the Disarmament
Office in Geneva, NZ has yet to be invited to take responsibility
for positions such as co-chair of Standing Committees. Rather than
expound theories as to why these situations have occurred, I make
the following recommendations:
- That the NZ government make a greater financial commitment
to demining and the work of the Ottawa Convention.
- That continuity of NZ's representation at the various meetings
of the States Parties be maintained, with the Disarmament Ambassador
being required to represent NZ at each annual meeting. The CALM
Convenor should also attend these important meetings.
- That NZ CALM resume a more aggressive stance with officials
of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to remind them that the battle
to clear the world of landmines is far from being won, and that
our country could make an even greater effort than at present
to support the work of the Ottawa Convention.
Much more could
be reported about the Managua Conference, but enough is enough.
I appreciated the nomination from CALM that I represent them on
the NZ Government Delegation, and I thank the Ministers of Disarmament
and Foreign Affairs and the officials of ISAC for their confidence
and support.
John Head
New
youth resources
The ICBL has launched two new youth resources, the Youth Campaign
Kit and the expanded Youth Website. These two advocacy tools are
designed to assist young campaigners to take action against landmines
in their communities.
The updated Youth Website, now online at http://www.icbl.org/youth,
includes background information about the landmines issue, news,
and information about how to take action. The Youth Campaign Kit
is a series of six booklets, similar in format to the ICBL Campaign
Kit. It contains background information on the landmines issue,
how to find and use landmines-related resources, how to take action,
publicize events, deliver landmines presentations and promote the
Youth Against War Treaty. Copies will be available in English and
Spanish from the ICBL Washington, DC office after 3 December.
For more information about the Youth Campaign Kit and Youth Website
and to order campaign kits please contact Jackie Hansen at jackie@icbl.org
or +1 202 547 2667.
Landmine
Monitor researchers' conference in Seoul
In late October
CALM Convenor Neil Mander attended the Asia-Pacific regional meeting
of Landmine Monitor researchers in Seoul, Korea, at the start of
work on the 2002 edition of the report. After reviewing the 2001
report the researchers considered the requirements for the 2002
report in the light of matters needing further investigation.
In an open letter
to ROK President Kim Dae Jung, the researchers thanked South Korea
for the hospitality they had received, congratulated him for his
initiatives in promoting peace and co-operation on the Korean peninsula,
including removal of landmines, and called on the two Korean governments
to join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.
Their visit
included a one-day bus trip to the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ) between
North and South Korea; a traditional Korean meal with a group of
civilian landmine victims in a village some 10km from the DMZ, who
spoke of the difficulties they had experienced in getting recognition,
assistance or compensation; a reception for an International Authors'
Conference on Reconciliation and Peace; and were welcomed to an
English-language church service by the president of the Korean Campaign
to Ban Landmines.
Worrying
US landmine policy shift
"We have
learned that the Pentagon is pushing the US to move away from existing,
flawed policy on landmines to an even worse policy which would see
it reject the Mine Ban Treaty outright and reserve mines for use
not only in Korea, but elsewhere," Mary Wareham of Human Rights
Watch has told CALM.
In its news
release, Human Rights Watch said from Washington that Pentagon officials
this month recommended that the US abandon its standing commitment
to join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty by 2006 if alternatives to antipersonnel
mines are identified and fielded.
The Pentagon's
review is one component of a multi-agency landmine policy review.
Officials in the Department of State and the National Security Council
will now join the review prior to a decision by
President Bush, which may occur by the end of 2001.
Such a policy
shift would also do away with a decision made in 1998 to discontinue
the use of antipersonnel mines not packaged with antivehicle mines
in delivery canisters, except in Korea, by 2003. A reversal of the
2003 deadline would free up 86 percent of the current 11.2 million
mine stockpile for use in the future. [Human Rights Watch]
* There are
now 142 signatories/ratifications/accessions to the Ottawa Mine
Ban Treaty, of which 122 are ratifications or accessions. The latest
are Chile on 10 September, Nigeria which acceded on 27 September,
and Algeria on 9 October.
* The resolution
in support of the Ottawa Convention was passed by the UN General
Assembly on 29 November 2001 by 138 votes to none against, and 19
abstentions.
* Last month
the NATO and the Ukraine signed an agreement covering the safe destruction
of 400,000 anti-personnel landmines.
* Jody Williams,
ICBL ambassador and joint Nobel Peace Prize laureate with ICBL,
married Human Rights Watch landmine campaigner Steve Goose in May.
CALM
AGM
This was held
in Wellington on 3 November 2001. CALM's work was reviewed in his
annual report by Convenor Neil Mander, and the financial situation
reported by treasurer Brian Hayes. Points for future action were:
Cluster bombs - John Head has had letters published protesting the
use of cluster bombs in Afghanistan, and mentioned that there have
been more hits on his website item on cluster bombs than on any
other item. John is one of the group of campaigners pressuring the
ICBL to consider cluster bombs, and as CALM has been calling for
this for years, we intend to continue our involvement.
Non State Actors - Neil is now Moderator of the ICBL's NSA working
group's email Yahoogroup.
Visit of activist - Yeshua Moser-Puangsuwan, co-founder of the International
Action Network and the Thailand Campaign to Ban Landmines, is visiting
NZ in December. He has worked with NSA groups.
United Nations - Tonga and Singapore were among Treaty non-signatories
who voted in favour of the Mine Ban Treaty resolution at the UN
First Committee. It was agreed to send CALM delegations to visit
their High Commissions, as well as the PNG commission and US embassy.
CCW Review Conference - It is expected that a working group will
be set up to draw up proposals for a new Protocol 5 on unexploded
remnants of war. Neil will liaise with the Australia Campaign (Australia
will chair the conference).
CHOGM - Neil to ask for the PM to include a call for universalisation
of the Mine Ban Treaty by Pacific nations in her opening statement.
NZ ODA - Neil to check that with the reorganisation of Overseas
Aid the funding of our demining programmes does not miss out.
CALM
2001 Annual Report
Excerpts are
given here: the full report can be obtained from the Convenor [see
back page]
Regrettably,
there are still countries holding out from ratification of the Mine
Ban treaty. These include Russia, China, India, much of the Middle
East, and the USA.
Closer to home
in the Pacific, Kiribati and Nauru have ratified the Treaty, joining
Fiji, Niue, Samoa and the Solomon Islands. We are still awaiting
ratification from Cook Islands, Marshall Islands and Vanuatu. Those
who have yet to take the first step of Treaty signing include Micronesia,
Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tonga and Tuvalu.
CALM has continued
its campaign work, maintaining liaison with government departments,
MPs, other NGOs and campaign groups overseas, especially the ICBL
and its NSA working group, and the groups involved in the cluster
bomb campaign (Mennonite Central Committee, Washington DC, and UK-based
Landmine Action).
CALM members
assisted with information gathering for Landmine Monitor 2001, for
New Zealand, Papua New Guinea and a dozen Pacific Island nations.
Neil Mander attended the researchers' meetings in Bangkok and Washington.
Information
was disseminated through the newsletter and internet website, provided
by the generosity of Protel and of Geoff Head.
Ottawa
revisited
From an article in the Ottawa Citizen by Rebecca Ho-Foster, Youth
Mine Action Ambassador Program, on the fourth anniversary of the
Ottawa Treaty signing (3 December 1997):
The Ottawa Convention
is defined as "comprehensive," which means that signatories
are under obligation not only to stop production, sale, stockpile
and transfer of this weapon, but also to reveal the human face of
the suffering caused by landmines.
A ban alone
is not enough. The obligation and commitment to rebuild and rehabilitate
communities goes beyond eliminating the weapon itself.
According to
Landmine Monitor 2001, there has been a decrease in mine victims
in the past year. However, 20,000 new landmine victims in 2001 is
unacceptable, and hundreds of thousands are already injured by landmines.
It is encouraging
to see that worldwide, there has been increased funding for mine
action. Canada's financial commitment since 1989 has exceeded $100
million. Today, more landmine survivors than ever are being assisted
by a variety of programs, from job training to peer counselling.
Canada has stood
at the forefront of the landmine issue from the beginning. The strength
behind Canada's work comes from ordinary citizens. Canadians have
supported landmine survivors and mine clearance through events ranging
from dinners in their homes to purchasing crafts made by Cambodian
landmine survivors.
While global
statistics show encouraging trends, and Canadians continue to remain
involved, there is so much left to be done. We can remind our leaders
of our concern about landmine victims as decisions are made to renew
funding this next year.
Canadians need
to continue to care about this issue.
[Editor: So
do New Zealanders!]
Edited by David Zwartz, despatch by Helen and David Zwartz
|