Newsletter October 1996
The Ottawa Conference:
Towards a global ban on anti-personnelmines
This is a personal report, firstly to thank members for the financial
support they gave CALM, enabling me to attend the conference; secondly,
to comment on aspects of the conference of interest to New Zealanders,
rather than give a comprehensive account of all the information given
and decisions made. - John V. Head
Contents:
- The New Zealand contribution
- Research into mine clearance
- Can NGOs influence governments?
- Medical issues
- Production and export of landmines
- Funding
- The military utility of landmines
- Conference decisions
- Some noteworthy quotes
- The way forward
There are further interesting aspects of the Ottawa
Conference that can't be included in a newsletter or put on our
World Wide Web page. CALM has arranged a public meeting to present
a fuller report, and give supporters an opportunity to ask questions
or comment.
VENUE: Shell Theatrette, 96 The Terrace, Wellington
DATE: Tuesday 26 November 1996
TIME: 5.30pm
|
The New Zealand Contribution
New Zealand delegates to the Ottawa Conference were: Caroline Forsyth
(Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, International Security and Arms
Control Division, Wellington) as Head of Delegation; and myself. I was
one of nine NGO representatives accredited to their country's official
delegations. We were able to participate in all sessions, even the closed
ones.
Thousands of New Zealand signatures were among the 2,600,000 who petitioned
for a ban on landmines. The art work of Thongsak Keokotarany (Mangere
Intermediate) and Nick Harwood (Karamu High School) was on display, selected
from the many contributions by students from around the world. Their posters
highlighted the suffering caused by one of the most insidious weapons
of all time.
At the conference's introductory session, Caroline Forsyth spoke of the
work of our demining teams, questioned the military utility of landmines,
and reported that New Zealand had now increased its contribution to the
UN "Voluntary Trust Fund for Assistance in Mine Clearance."
This is in addition to the funding it gave to other mine clearing projects
in places such as Cambodia.
The New Zealand government was one of the first offering to co-sponsor
a resolution being presented at the current session of the UN General
Assembly, calling for an international agreement to ban anti-personnel
landmines.
Research into Mine Clearance
The day before the conference opened delegates were invited to "One
step at a time," an exhibition of humanitarian demining at the Canadian
War Museum.
We saw a Canadian-trained German Shepherd dog sniff out explosives in
a mock minefield, and then watched three Canadian soldiers take 20 minutes
to methodically search an area 1 metre x 2 metres for mines. It was a
great demonstration, by well-trained soldiers, but I wondered how long
it will take us to clear the estimated 110,000,000 landmines now creating
havoc and misery in 71 countries.
Before the conference I was advised not to push for further research into
mine clearance, because the more funding those projects get, the less
will be available for mine clearance, mine awareness programmes, and victim
support. The prodding method used in the demonstration is at present the
only effective way of clearing mines with the required 99.6% degree of
certainty.
At one of the NGO information sessions, David Gowdey (author of "The
hidden killers") reviewed mine clearing procedures around the world.
I asked about research into mine clearance. David stated that new methods
had been found to locate mines, but unfortunately, small US companies
did not have the funds to develop programmes, and major companies do not
work in this area because, David said, there is such limited demand for
the equipment that it would not be profitable for them. "It is all
a matter of dollars." The US Pentagon has put considerable resources
into mine clearance but their discoveries are not available to humanitarian
deminers.
Quoting the underfunded researches of Lawrence Carter at Auckland University,
and Australian work at the Fred Hollows Foundation and the Defence Scientific
and Technology Organisation, I called for more funding and better co-ordination
of research activities. If landmines can be quickly located and destroyed,
their military significance will disappear and the production of landmines
will cease.
On the conference's final day, Mr Hans Kligenburg of the Danish Foreign
Ministry reviewed the July 1996 Copenhagen Conference. New Zealand was
not one of the 48 countries attending. Part of the conference reviewed
new researches into mine detection. It was noted that five European countries
(Denmark, Norway, Germany, Netherlands and Sweden) were helping fund this
research. The Danish report showed that there is a lot of research going
on around the world, and the prospects for more efficient and speedier
mine detection are promising.
The Military Utility of Landmines
At one of the conference open sessions the president of the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Mr Cornelia Sommaruga, spoke about
an ICRC report which questioned the value of landmines in war. It also
detailed the dangers they present to soldiers laying them.
In the Korean War, two Canadian servicemen were killed by landmines laid
by Canadians, and the ICRC reported that fifty Australian soldiers were
wounded when they walked into a Canadian minefield. Fifteen prominent
retired US generals (including the former commanders of NATO, and the
Korean, Vietnam and Gulf wars) have called for a ban. We were challenged
to add retired generals from our own country to the list.
At one of the NGO seminars, Nola Skinner of King's College, Cambridge,
UK reported on research her team is doing in Eritrea, Falkland Islands,
Iraq, India, Pakistan, Finland and South Korea to ascertain whether the
tactical value of landmines was greater than their disadvantages. Nola
has promised to keep CALM informed of their findings.
Can NGOs Influence Governments?
The world-wide call to ban landmines was inspired initially by the
ICRC and other NGOs. The importance of NGOs in the campaign, and their
influence on politicians and government policies, was very evident at
the conference. Don Herbert of Dalhousie University (Canada) spoke at
an NGO forum about the influence of NGOs. I was able to table a CALM report
on the effectiveness of NGOs in New Zealand. This is available on CALM's
Internet web site: http://www.protel.co.nz/calm
Cornelia Sommaruga of the ICRC spoke of the feelings of Red Cross nurses
and doctors who have to look into the eyes of children whose limbs have
been turned into a gory mess of flesh and bone splinters by landmines.
He called for urgent action to stigmatise and ban them. "The landmine
crisis cannot wait for a consensus decision by United Nations committees.
Every fifteen minutes someone in the world is being killed or mutilated
by a landmine and by the year 2007, the year when new UN controls come
into force, there will be a further 200,000 victims."
Later that day at the NGO/academic panel, Peter Herby of ICRC reminded
us of the success of the recent World Court decision on nuclear war. He
said that the ICRC was preparing a case to go before the World Court calling
for the banning of landmines, on the grounds that:
their use is aimed at the civilian population;
they cause unnecessary suffering; and
their use is against humanitarian law.
Of soldiers wounded in battle, about 25% die of their wounds; 60% fully
recover; and only 15% are left with a permanent disability.
But for those wounded by landmines, 30% die of wounds; 60% are left with
a permanent disability; and only 10% recover fully.
Peter Herby called for the medical community throughout the world to support
actively the call for a landmine ban.
Production and Export of Landmines
Steve Goose of the Human Rights Watch Arms Project reported on thorough
investigations into landmine producers in the USA. He found that no company
produced landmines, but eight companies produced landmine components.
UNICEF and other NGOs await his report and are considering trade embargoes
on those firms. Radiola has ceased production on humanitarian grounds.
He told me that although landmines continue to be produced in large quantities
in a number of countries, his research showed that few if any countries
were now exporting them.
Production has been banned in Italy but it is rumoured that one company
involved (Valsella Meccanotecnica of Brescia) has transferred its technology
and staff to Singapore to continue production there.
Countries which have banned landmines and are destroying all their stocks
(except those needed for training deminers) include Germany, Sweden, Belgium,
Norway, Italy, Philippines, Switzerland and Austria.
Funding
The United Nations estimates that it would cost between US$33 billion
and US$100 billion to remove all landmines. (UN reports suggest that 1-2
million more mines are still being laid each year.)
In 1994 the UN Secretary-General called a conference of concerned countries
to raise funds for demining. He expected pledges of US$70 million, achieved
pledges of $20 million, but received only $14 million in the following
year. Since 1994 a further $14 million has been received.
Landmines are being cleared under UN auspices in 14 countries but it was
disappointing to hear that some mine-clearing projects in Nicaragua, Angola
and Cambodia have run out of funds and stopped operating.
There are an estimated 110,000,000 landmines to be cleared, world-wide.
Although about 100,000 a year are being cleared, UN reports suggest that
a further 1 to 2 million are still being laid each year.
The US Pentagon is funding extensive research into mine clearance methods
but the results are not available for humanitarian deminers. Other counties
funding research are Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and Germany.
Rehabilitation of landmine survivors is grossly underfunded. Gerry White,
a landmine survivor, told the conference how little is being done for
their welfare.
- The call went out from Hon Lloyd Axworthy, Canada's Minister of
Foreign Affairs, on behalf of those present, for all nations to support
a ban for the production, transfer, storage and use of landmines by
the year 2000.
- Countries were invited to meet again in Belgium in June 1997, to
draw up a treaty, and then meet again in Ottawa in December 1997 to
sign it.
- We were asked to develop political and NGO contacts at a regional
level, to encourage all countries in the world to sign the treaty.
There is awareness that in spite of great world-wide momentum calling
for a ban, at this stage we would expect a small number of countries
not prepared to support it. [Cuba, Libya, Vietnam and China were not
prepared to support the ban proposed by the Inter-Parliamentary Union
at its last meeting in Beijing, September 1996.]
- Countries were encouraged to co-sponsor the resolution being presented
to the present session of the UN General Assembly this month, calling
for an international agreement to ban anti-personnel landmines. [The
New Zealand government was one of the first to offer to co-sponsor
the resolution.]
- There was agreement that extra finance and research was needed
for landmine clearance, mine awareness programmes, and victim assistance.
Cornelia Sommaruga (ICRC): "The land that used to feed
them will now only maim and kill them."
Ambassador Molander (Sweden): "Violations of the Protocols
should be treated as war crimes."
Stephen Lewis (UNICEF): "We must reverse this tide
of insanity."
Linda Trapp (World Vision): "Anti-people mines
is one of the legacies we are passing on to the children of the world."
Chris Moon (Landmine Survivors): "I stepped on a mine
- where did my leg go?"
Stephen Lewis (UNICEF): "187 countries have ratified
the Rights of the Child Convention, but landmines have taken away
their rights under Articles 1 and 6."
Senator Leahy (USA): "Landmines are one of the most
insidious weapons of all time."
Cornelia Sommaruga (ICRC): "The world cannot wait for
consensus decisions."
Bob Lawson (Canadian government): "The ripples caused
by our early campaigns have grown into waves which are going to sweep
away all obstructions to banning landmines."
Jody Williams (International Campaign to Ban Landmines):
"Lloyd Axworthy's challenge to sign an international treaty in December
1997 shows courage, vision, and true global leadership."
The Way Forward
In New Zealand we should be:
- Calling on our government to increase its funding for UN demining,
and the rehabilitation of survivors;
- Urging our government to work on establishing a landmine-free zone
in the South Pacific - MP Joy McLachlan's letter to all South Pacific
Forum leaders is a very welcome first step;
- Supporting the fund-raising activities of humanitarian organisations
such as Red Cross, Oxfam, World Vision and the Cambodia Trust;
- Supporting the activities of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines.
There is growing momentum throughout the world to support a world-wide
ban. Great admiration was shown for Canada's initiative in calling the
Ottawa conference, shaping the agenda, and, when the way ahead looked
uncertain, challenging those present to support an international treaty.
We in CALM and in New Zealand must do all we can to encourage the continuation
of this momentum and so clear the world of these inhumane weapons.
John V. Head
Convenor, CALM
6 John Sims Drive, Broadmeadows, Wellington.
Phone: (04) 478-1828. Fax: (04) 384-2112. E-mail:
jhead@i4free.co.nz
|